Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Stigma of Tattoos in the Workplace

Stigma of Tattoos in the studyAnna MarksJo ValeAbstract This interrogation looks at the stereotype of tattoos in the workplace today.The research draws upon more(prenominal) or lessly primary sources including teleph unmatchable interviews and questionnaires.This constitution intends to try that tender attitudes argon changing in relation to tattoos and that by identifying that tattoos are a part of life with stunned delay and depart continue to be, the arrest is to eliminate the assumption that all muckle with tattoos are involved with offensive or unemployable.The results were surprising as they revealed that the younger generations were more buttoned-down in relation to tattoos in a professional environment.Introduction By describing and analysing its most important aspects, this report intends to discuss and evaluate the results that originated through research into the blot of tattoos in the workplace on volume today.The issues c everyplaceed by this report incl ude the percentage of people who feel discriminated against beca procedure of their tattoos and the people who dont agree with tattoos creation on display in the workplace.This topic is important as now a fifth of all British adults have been tattooed (J Henley) and with that number, ever increase tattoos are becoming the social norm, employers will have to start making just about changes to their dress codes if they want a new generation of employees. Tattoos started as an exclusively female practice in ancient Egypt, mummies found with tattoos were unremarkably dismissed and assumed they were of a dubious status (C Lineberry) and until the early mid-nineties this opinion was largely unchanged, with only 15% of baby boomers (born betwixt 1946-1964) with tattoos and 59% having the opinion that if you had tattoos you were involved with crime or in enlisted military personnel. (J Squires)However, social attitudes are changing and that is simply non the case any more, with increa singly more professionals reporting they have tattoos.Methodology A mixed regularity approach was used as good variation in info collection usually, leads to greater validity within the work. This was demonstrated with a replete(p) variety of responses from several different sources.The research was approached from a practical standpoint, qualitative and quantitative data was collect through interviews and questionnaires. Quantitate data provided lots-needed clarification passim the research process. However, this method of data collection limited participant responses and are, and so of little use if depth is required.The methodological approach involved qualitative methods within the research. This method is more suitably used when less education is known, this allows those who do not want to share too much to contribute, without losing out on important development. However, there was a small percentage of people who preferred not to divulge that private culture.Primary s ources were used more broadly, as the research contained some questions which some might find sore in nature and it allowed the questions that needed to be asked, to be asked. This was initially deemed repugnant for primary data collection, however, the anonymity of the primary data method basically worked in favour of the research as participants were much more blossom forthed with their answers when provided with secrecy.Secondary sources were very valuable within research as it allowed statistic comparison and outside data to aid preliminary research. Comparisons of documents and records as well as the use of the census were helpful and reinforced the primary research done.The use of secondary sources helped construct an argument that would have been difficult to make without this information. However, information gathered through this source did create reconsiderations on how to go just about the research, for example, secondary data offered a new perspective which introd uced new ideas and gave the research more range.Results and Findings The findings suggested that people, in general, did not feel as victimised everyplace their tattoos in the workplace as initially thought, it can be seen from the say that out of 88 tattooed individuals aged 18-61 only 5 people matt-up that they had been treated differently at work or not gained troth because of their tattoos, the small 5.7% of people thought that They will affect me in the future. A much higher percentage of people did not feel discriminated against for their tattoos as those who did. This was an unexpected finding.The findings showed 94.3% of people who were asked did not feel that their employers had any issues with their tattoos at all.The results showed expectedly that some of the over 30s disliked visible tattoos in the workplace and thought that they should be covered, with most describing them as unprofessional and inappropriate 61% of people who took the evaluate without tattoos felt t hey should be covered up. Of that 61%, only 27% of them were over 30 making the majority between 18-26-year-olds who were against visible tattoos in a professional environmentDiscussion Out of the vast majority of participants with tattoos, 97% did not have any involvement with the navy/army or with crime. It was initially thought that these percentages would be higher as the stigma of tattooed people being involved in crime and/or enlisted is a democratic reason in which most people do not reckon to like them, with 1 participant saying Tattoos only used to be for thugs.The original hypothesis does not competent with the results maintained through the research, it was initially thought that there would be a significant difference between a younger persons positive attitude to visible tattoos in the work-place than an old persons negative attitude. This was an unexpected finding, however, to try and explain this Wallop (2015) discussed the force of the so-called midlife crisiss affecting those over 30 and how it is becoming increasingly common for them to force back tattoos later in life Tattoos, are now as much a part of a midlife crisis as scouring Facebook for old flames. A recent survey found that almost a quarter of 30 to 59-year-olds have a tattoo somewhere on their body, compared with less than one in six of those aged between 18 and 24. This shows the stigma of tattoos travel away slowly and the older generation gradually backing follow up on the hardened stereotyped view of tattoos. Backing this theory up, an obligate from Forbes, published in 2011 argues that tattoos still have a negative impact on employment (L Faw) However, in 2013 they retracted their statement, saying tattoos were no long-acting a kiss of death in the workplace (R Hennessey) This correlates with the data collected through previous research that was conducted and is interesting because, with just 2 old age difference it can be seen from the evidence that social attitudes appeared to have changed, these results break an interesting finding as it seems that it is millennials that have become more conservative in their views.However, a study by CareerBuilder showed that 31% of employers said that having a visible tattoo is one of the reasons they would be less likely to get on an individual (2011)86% of young professionals do not think tattoos crucify the chance of getting jobs (A Mishra S Mishra) and that grooming and business attire were more important indicators in the hiring decision than tattoos and piercings (J McLeod) as well as printing that they feel more approachable by younger generations in the workplace. termination The thesis of this report was to analyse and discuss conducted research into the stigma of tattoos in the workplace.In conclusion, from the evidence presented in this report, it can be seen that the hypothesis does not connect with the results presented. Initially, it was thought that younger people would be more open to displaying tattoos at work, in fact, this was not the case. 72.2% of 18-26-year-olds do not think tattoos viewing in the workplace is appropriate, it was the older generation that had fewer problems with tattoos. However, with no information from the age range spanning between 27-29 statistics, it would be irresponsible to presume the figures that they fit into.Tattoos have been here for a long time and the findings suggest that they will be around for a lot more. It seems that tattoos may become more acceptable not only in the workplace but in general societyReferences The rise and rise of the tattoo, J Henley, Tuesday 20 July 2010 https//www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2010/jul/20/tattoos Visible Tattoos And Other Corporate No-Nos, Larissa Faw, October 25 2011, http//www.forbes.com/sites/forbeswomanfiles/2011/10/25/visible-tattoos-and-other-corporate-no-nos/363efdd3670fTattoos No Longer A Kiss Of Death In The Workplace, Rachel Hennessey, February 27, 2013 http//www.forbes.com/si tes/rachelhennessey/2013/02/27/having-a-tattoo-and-a-job/120e998d5b92Anurag Mishra Sasmita Mishra p.3, April, 2015 http//www.ijird.com/index.php/ijird/ word/view/69975/54946The Hidden Mark An Ethnographic Examination of Visibility in Heavily Tattooed Professionals, Josh M. McLeod p.23 https//dspace.royalroads.ca/bitstream/handle/10170/703/mcleod_josh.pdf?sequence=1isAllowed=yHarris Interactive on behalf of CareerBuilder June 29, 2011, Bad Breath, Heavy Cologne and Wrinkled Clothes Among Factors That Can bedevil You Less Likely to Get Promoted, http//www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?sd=6%2F30%2F2011id=pr642ed=12%2F31%2F2011Bibliography The subject field Archives http//www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/The Huffington Post http//www.huffingtonpost.com/annie-singer/tattoos-in-the-workplace-_b_9321408.html

No comments:

Post a Comment